Tao,

Thanks a lot! My understanding is that Ruby implements cache coherence
protocols, which the simple memory model lacks, right? If not, what is
exactly the difference between Ruby and classic memory models then?

I am using version 2.0, is that up-to-date or I need to get a recent one
from dev?

Thanks,
Mohammed


-- 
Mohammed G. Khatib, PhD.
Postdoctoral Researcher
NEC Laboratories America, Inc.

T: +1 (609) 902 6375                                4 Independence Way,
Suite 200
E: [email protected]                           Princeton, NJ 08540
W: www.nec-labs.com/~khatib                   USA


On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Tao Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mohammed,****
>
> ** **
>
> I am not quite sure what you mean “sacrifice coherency for timing”. Even
> though you simulate a multi-core processor later, the memory can still work
> as long as you have a shared last level cache. In other words, the cache
> system will handle the coherency issue. ****
>
> ** **
>
> The simpleDRAM does report many statistical results. If you are using the
> most recent version of gem5, you can even specify the memory model you want
> to use in the command line by “--mem-type=”. The available options are
> “simple_mem” (by default), “ddr3-1600” (an instance of SimpleDDR3),
> “lpddr2_s4-1066” (an instance of SimpleLPDDR2_S4), and “wio-200” (an
> instance of SimpleWideIO). You can refer to configs/common/Options.py for
> the definition of command line option, and configs/common/MemConfig.py for
> the list of available options. After you finish a simulation, you can see
> the performance report in m5out/stats.txt.****
>
> ** **
>
> -Tao****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Mohammed G. Khatib
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 5:26 PM
> *To:* gem5 users mailing list
> *Subject:* Re: [gem5-users] Configuring a 3 level memory hierarchy****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Tao,****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for your answers. I read about simpleDRAM which I can use. But it
> seems, from my readings so far, is that I need to sacrifice coherency for
> timing in case I want to go mutli-core later. Is that correct? Can you
> point out how I can use simpleDRAM (an example) and also activate its
> statistics (heatmap, distributions, latencies, ...?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thank you,****
>
> Mohammed****
>
> ** **
>
>
> ****
>
> -- ****
>
> Mohammed G. Khatib, PhD.
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> NEC Laboratories America, Inc.
>
> T: +1 (609) 902 6375                                4 Independence Way,
> Suite 200
> E: [email protected]                           Princeton, NJ 08540
> W: www.nec-labs.com/~khatib                   USA****
>
> ** **
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Tao Zhang <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> Hi Mohammed,****
>
>  ****
>
> Please see my answers to your questions below.****
>
>  ****
>
> -Tao****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On
> Behalf Of *Mohammed G. Khatib
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 28, 2013 4:43 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [gem5-users] Configuring a 3 level memory hierarchy****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi all,****
>
>  ****
>
> This is my first time using gem5 and I want to simulate a single-core
> systen. I want to make sure that I got the caches, their protocol and the
> CPU right and realistic for "accurate" timings. Here is what I need:****
>
>  ****
>
> 1. A single-core cpu with all cache levels (I want to try with and without
> L3 cache).****
>
> 2. I want to use the SE execution model since I think this is sufficient.*
> ***
>
> 3. A time-accurate memory model for DRAM where I can get latency
> distribution of accesses, total number of accesses, number of writes to
> each memory work/byte, number of reads.****
>
>  ****
>
> - I am not sure if ruby is of good use here or your a DRAM model is
> sufficient? What do you suggest?****
>
> Ruby does not have a time-accurate DRAM model yet. Alternatively, classic
> memory system has relatively higher accuracy. You can leverage classic
> memory system directly.****
>
>  ****
>
> - In the config.ini file cpu clock and cache latency do not have units,
> what are the units?****
>
> The default unit is picosecond (ps). A 2GHz clock is therefore shown as
> “clock = 500”. ****
>
>  ****
>
> - Can anyone point me or help set up a configuration file?****
>
> You can refer to the thread
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg07019.html to create
> your own configuration file.****
>
>  ****
>
> Basically I want to test running a program on DRAM and see the
> distribution of writes and reads to memory addresses. Also I want to gather
> latency information to see DRAM contribution to the overall performance.**
> **
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Mohammed****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users

Reply via email to