Hi Nathanael, If you get a chance could you see if this patch http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1740/ fixes the problem you encountered?
Thanks, Ali On Feb 19, 2013, at 7:26 AM, Nathanaël Prémillieu <nathanael.premill...@irisa.fr> wrote: > Hi Ali, > > I have not try to implement that, I still have my bad solution implemented. > And for the moment, I don't really have the time to work on the solution you > have proposed. > > Thanks, > Nathanaël > > Le 19/02/2013 14:04, Ali Saidi a écrit : >> Hi Nathanaël, >> >> Did you try to implement this? >> >> Thanks, >> Ali >> >> On Feb 1, 2013, at 6:12 PM, Ali Saidi <sa...@umich.edu >> <mailto:sa...@umich.edu>> wrote: >> >>> The quickest thing I can think to do is everywhere that the test for >>> intreg15/is_branch is done add something like && isFloating(). >>> >>> >>> Ali >>> >>> >>> On 01.02.2013 17:31, Nathanaël Prémillieu wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Patchhttp://reviews.gem5.org/r/1376/ (changeset 9153) adds a test to >>>> identify load as control instructions if it write to the PC register. >>>> But VLDR (vector load, floating point instruction) (and possibly others >>>> instructions) are constructed using the same code. If this instruction >>>> write to the FP reg 15, then its _dest variable is 15 (= INTREG_PC), >>>> then the instruction is marked as being a control instruction, which is >>>> wrong (I believe there is no floating point branch instruction). >>>> >>>> However, I don't really know how to correct that as this part of the >>>> instruction generator is quite obscure for me. >>>> For the moment, I will just add a test that check if the control flag >>>> and the floating point flag are set and disable the control flag in that >>>> case. But it is not a good solution :) >>>> >>>> Does anyone have an idea on how to correct that? >>>> >>>> Nathanaël >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> gem5-users mailing list >>>> gem5-users@gem5.org <mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org> >>>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> gem5-users mailing list >>> gem5-users@gem5.org <mailto:gem5-users@gem5.org> >>> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gem5-users mailing list >> gem5-users@gem5.org >> http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users >> > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
_______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
