Thanks for your pointers, I'll look into that. Once I have something to report or ask I'll do it in gem5-dev.
Yuval -----Original Message----- From: gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org [mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org] On Behalf Of Korey Sewell Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:18 PM To: gem5 users mailing list Subject: Re: [gem5-users] Inorder switch on cache hit Hi Yuval, Unfortunately, this isnt something you can switch in the config file (although it should be), so you'll need to edit some code to get this working. First, there is some code in pipeline_stage.cc that says asks an instruction if it's stalled on memory or not. I'm guessing "inst->isMemStall()". This function needs not to return true after only 1 cycle. Second, that function is set to true in cache_unit.cc. In the execute function, you'll probably see a "inst->setMemStall()" in there if it tries to complete the access and the data isnt available yet. What you'll need to do is edit that code in cache_unit.cc to just wait the necessary amount of cycles before declaring a memory stall. Please move the conversation to gem5-dev if you want to go the route of submitting the patch to make the "MemStall" general instead of 1 cycle. On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Yuval H. Nacson <yhnac...@tx.technion.ac.il> wrote: > Hey, > > > > In my quest of inorder pipeline I've encountered another problem. > > I run two threads on a switch on cache miss machine. Also. as opposed > to other question I've sent so far, I'm using the 5 stages pipeline > supplied with the simulator. > > The Frequency is 2Ghz and I set the cache latency to be 800ps (which > is more than a clock cycle). > > > > Now. In the fourth stage memory request is being sent and in the fifth > stage the cache is being read. > > I get the following: > > > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: [tid:0]: Not blocked, so attempting to > run stage. > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: [tid:0]: Processing instruction > [sn:41180] ldq with PC (0x1200003f0=>0x1200003f4) > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: [tid:0]: [sn:41180]: sending request to > system.cpu.dcache_port. > > 159888500: system.cpu.dcache_port: [tid:0]: [sn:41180]: Updating the > command for this instruction > > 159888500: system.cpu.dcache_port: [tid:0]: [sn:41180]: Trying to > Complete Data Read Access > > 159888500: system.cpu.dcache_port: STALL: [tid:0]: Data miss from > 0x12009ed78 > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: [tid:0]: [sn:41180] request to > system.cpu.dcache_port failed. > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: [tid:0] [sn:41180] Detected cache miss. > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: Inserting [tid:0][sn:41180] into switch > out buffer. > > 159888500: system.cpu: Scheduling CPU Event (SquashFromMemStall) for > cycle 159888500, [tid:0]. > > 159888500: system.cpu.ResourcePool: Ignoring Unrecognized CPU Event > (SquashFromMemStall). > > 159888500: system.cpu.stage4: Suspending [tid:0] due to cache miss. > > > > . > > > > 159888800: system.cpu.dcache_port: [tid:0]: [sn:41180]: [slot:4] > Waking from cache access (vaddr.0x12009ed78, paddr:0x090d78) > > 159888800: system.cpu.dcache_port: [tid:0]: [sn:41180]: Processing > cache access > > 159888800: system.cpu.dcache_port: [tid:0]: [sn:41180]: Bytes loaded were: > 0000000000000000 > > 159888800: system.cpu.dcache_port: [tid:0] Waking up from Cache Miss. > > 159888800: system.cpu: [tid:0]: Activating ... > > > > Note the Time differences. > > I would like to have my cache to have a latency of 2-3 cycles and not > having the thread switched. Can it be done? > > > > Thanks, > > Yuval > > > _______________________________________________ > gem5-users mailing list > gem5-users@gem5.org > http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users -- - Korey _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users _______________________________________________ gem5-users mailing list gem5-users@gem5.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gem5-users
