Colin D Bennett wrote: > A feature I have heard previously requested is to be able to mark > certain layers as “no-DRC”. For instance, to allow special trace > elements such as antennas that the DRC thinks are incorrect shorts > between two nets.
These should be omited from update_rats, rather than be ignored on DRC. The DRC as it is currently implemented, does not check for correct connectivty. It does not detect a short. I think, this functionality would be best implemented with a flag "don-t-check-connectivity" added to the object. Put these antennas in a separate layer and make DRC special for this layer would still feel like a crutch. > I also would like this so that the “outline” layer or > extra layers with my own notes, calculations, fab notes, etc., are not > considered for DRC. ack. This would remove a couple of entries in my list of warts and wishes. I just checked -- PCB does not barf on additional parameters in the Layer line. So there may be a smooth upgrade to add a flag parameter to the layer stance. Looks like old versions of PCB would just ignore it. You'd loose flag on save with the old binary, though. IMHO, this is acceptable if flags are defined such that no flag reprensents the current state as a default. Any comments by the devs? Would you accept a patch along these lines? ---<)kaimartin(>--- -- Kai-Martin Knaak Email: k...@familieknaak.de http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:11371/pks/lookup?search=0x6C0B9F53 not happy with moderation of geda-user _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
