On Mar 19, 2011, at 10:50 AM, Martin Kupec wrote: > On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:14:54AM -0600, John Doty wrote: >> >> On Mar 18, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Martin Kupec wrote: >> >>> If layers types would be defined by attributes, someone would be able to >>> declare one layer both as conductive and as silk for example. That could >>> cause me a nighmares. That is why I insist on 'typed' layers, not >>> 'tagged' layer. >> >> No. The nightmare is classification. >> >> It's perfectly possible to put conductive ink on a board with a silkscreen >> process. > No problem here. Just define that conductive ink as copper or conductive > type layer. I don't care how that layer happens to be manufactured.
No. For describing geometry, I agree that the manufacturing process is irrelevant. But the layer needs properties, not some arbitrary classification. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ j...@noqsi.com _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
