On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:14:54AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 2:23 PM, Martin Kupec wrote:
>
> > If layers types would be defined by attributes, someone would be able to
> > declare one layer both as conductive and as silk for example. That could
> > cause me a nighmares. That is why I insist on 'typed' layers, not
> > 'tagged' layer.
>
> No. The nightmare is classification.
>
> It's perfectly possible to put conductive ink on a board with a silkscreen
> process.
No problem here. Just define that conductive ink as copper or conductive
type layer. I don't care how that layer happens to be manufactured.
Martin Kupec
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
