On Sep 6, 2010, at 9:48 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote: > John Doty <[email protected]> writes: > >> On Sep 5, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Stephan Boettcher wrote: >> >>> Yes, the gschem file format is much less accessible for >>> hand/awk/sed-editing than the pcb file format. >> >> Huh? gschem format is *trivial* to parse in awk. Use rules like: >> >> $1==L { >> x1 = $2 >> y1 = $3 >> ... > > But the meat is in the following lines, those things I'd want to mangle.
Well, either grab the interesting lines directly, make your rules stateful (set a flag when you are processing an "interesting" component, for example), or put the parsed data into an associative array that you then process with your END rule. It doesn't seem hard to me, anyway. > >> Or for simple things just skip the symbolic names. XML is much harder. > > Oh yes, XML is horrible. > > -- > Stephan Böttcher FAX: +49-431-880-3968 > Extraterrestrische Physik Tel: +49-431-880-2508 > I.f.Exp.u.Angew.Physik mailto:[email protected] > Leibnizstr. 11, 24118 Kiel, Germany > > > _______________________________________________ > geda-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
