On Sep 5, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote: > It's because it's inflexible and unintuitive.
The gEDA schematic format is flexible, intuitive, easy to parse, easy to generate, and well described by concise documentation. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ [email protected] _______________________________________________ geda-user mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
