Agreed, I know I'm heavily biased myself towards a little corner of tech. PS: I raised the issue of the local headers in https://github.com/csaybar/ESA-zar-zip-decision/issues/5, if you want to follow.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, at 12:07, Michael Sumner wrote: > Agree with all this, unfortunately xarray was a bit late with PR 9543 that > provides a basis for implicit coordinates (and will hopefully feed down into > Zarr), and knowing the difference from the low basis NetCDF provided. > > There's a lot to it, but my read is that xarray is the new and way better > NetCDF (and I mean really damn impressive and ambitious and general), but > because it's born in python it missed a lot of really key geospatial > foundations that we take for granted, and for various reasons don't flow well > from rasterio through xarray . > > I have long seen a need for some pretty serious cross discipline reviews, and > many of those are happening but not always enough, especially with > generational overwork and "novelty" burnout. > > > Appreciate the discussion here a lot. > Cheers, Mike >
_______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
