Hearing silence, the only logical conclusion is that there is no
interest ==> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11746
Le 27/09/2024 à 20:15, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit :
Hi,
This is your regular remainder that nobody in the core GDAL maintainer
team is a CSharp aficionado (we don't have a personal grief against
it, just that we are blatantly ignorant, at least speaking for myself
!), so related tickets about it will definitely result in no action.
See
https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22csharp+bindings%22
The current trend is that people seem to be annoyed by UTF-8 related
issues. The issue is likely that our methods that accept or take a
const char* in the SWIG bindings should use a specific typemap to map
to CSharp Unicode strings instead of the "C" one or whatever those
concepts are called in CSharp. There is an existing "utf8_path"
typemap that is used in method that accept filenames, that should
probably be renamed to utf8_string and be used more extensively. And
probably with a version of the methods to also return a raw C string /
bytearray in the cases where drivers don't know the encoding and might
return "random" stuff. Cf pull request #10652 where I did something
for Java that suffered from that later issue.
Happy pull requests!
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
Grumpy maintainer.
"De l'égo à l'égoût, il n'y a qu'une bouche mal refermée", André Isaac
_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
