On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 at 06:24, David Strip <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the path forward? One path Howard suggests is establishing a > foundation similar to that behind Qgis. Another alternative, probably far > more controversial, is a license change.
I'm pretty clueless regarding licenses -- but this is an interesting thought. I wonder if any new drivers added to GDAL could be done with a dual-licensing under both GPL + some other license which requires ongoing sponsorship of the GDAL project? Nyall _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
