gcc  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: function parameters Martin Uecker
  • Re: function parameters Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Re: [PATCH 3/4] libbacktrace: work with aslr on windows Björn Schäpers
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] libbacktrace: work with aslr on windows Eli Zaretskii via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] libbacktrace: work with aslr on windows Björn Schäpers
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] libbacktrace: work with aslr on windows LIU Hao via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH 3/4] libbacktrace: work with aslr on windows Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc
• Re: [PATCH 2/4] libbacktrace: detect executable path on windows Björn Schäpers
  • Re: [PATCH 2/4] libbacktrace: detect executable path on windows Ian Lance Taylor via Gcc
• Reporitng libstdc++ bug without account to Bugzilla Palmu, Miro M
  • Re: Reporitng libstdc++ bug without account to Bugzilla Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• GCC 14.0.0 Status Report (2023-11-20), Stage 3 in effect now Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231119 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Get Busy at TASA Midwinter Conference 2024 Chris Altieri
• gcc-13-20231118 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Recordings of cauldron 2023 talks Heiko
  • Re: Recordings of cauldron 2023 talks David Edelsohn via Gcc
• [no subject] Zebediah Beck via Gcc
  • Re: David Edelsohn via Gcc
  • Re: Zebediah Beck via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231117 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [PATCH] C++: Introduce the extended attribute for asm declarations Julian Waters via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231116 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• [ARM] unexpected sizeof() of a complex packed type Dmitry Antipov
  • Re: [ARM] unexpected sizeof() of a complex packed type Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• [Analyzer] Transform a region 't[i]' to its svalue form '&t + (i * element_size)' Pierrick Philippe
• [RISC-V] [SIG-toolchain] Meeting will be canceled (Nov 16, 2023) jiawei
• Typo in "C++ Standards Support in GCC" Taisei Katô via Gcc
  • Re: Typo in "C++ Standards Support in GCC" David Malcolm via Gcc
• gcc cobol status James K. Lowden
  • gcc cobol status James K. Lowden
• Q Lê như Hiệp via Gcc
• gcc/DATESTAMP not updated since 20231109 Rainer Orth
  • Re: gcc/DATESTAMP not updated since 20231109 Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• Understanding where a certain RTX comes from Enrico via Gcc
• [RFC] Structured Exception Handling support for Windows Julian Waters via Gcc
• Question about vectorization optimization during RTL-PASS Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231112 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Missed optimization of strcpy(3) (or stpcpy(3)) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
  • Re: Missed optimization of strcpy(3) (or stpcpy(3)) Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Missed optimization of strcpy(3) (or stpcpy(3)) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231111 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Missing DWARF children for variable templates Nima Hamidi via Gcc
  • Re: Missing DWARF children for variable templates Nima Hamidi via Gcc
  • Re: Missing DWARF children for variable templates Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• GCC devroom at FOSDEM 2024: Call for Participation open David Malcolm via Gcc
  • GCC developer room at FOSDEM 2024: Call for Participation open Thomas Schwinge
• gcc-12-20231110 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• yyyÿyy Kelly Coleman via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231109 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Bug: GCC riscv building fails at self-tests with specific march Michael T. Kloos
  • Re: Bug: GCC riscv building fails at self-tests with specific march Michael T. Kloos
• Questions about vectorizing a simple loop by inferring the range from array Hao Liu OS via Gcc
  • Re: Questions about vectorizing a simple loop by inferring the range from array Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Questions about vectorizing a simple loop by inferring the range from array Hao Liu OS via Gcc
• Sourceware Open Office, Friday Novemer 10, 18:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• Article suggestion (note for admin) Dwayne Jacobs
  • Re: Article suggestion (note for admin) carl hansen via Gcc
• Lots of FAILs in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/* Maxim Blinov via Gcc
  • Re: Lots of FAILs in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/* Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Lots of FAILs in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/* Maxim Blinov via Gcc
  • Re: Re: Lots of FAILs in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/* juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
  • Re: Lots of FAILs in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/* Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Lots of FAILs in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/* Jeff Law via Gcc
• Hhb bị in bị Linh Tran via Gcc
• Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Martin Jambor
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Frank Ch. Eigler via Gcc
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Mark Wielaard
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Martin Jambor
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Christophe Lyon via Gcc
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Maxim Kuvyrkov via Gcc
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Martin Jambor
  • Re: Checks that autotools generated files were re-generated correctly Christophe Lyon via Gcc
• Emacs ChangeLog generation and commit messages Florian Weimer via Gcc
  • Re: Emacs ChangeLog generation and commit messages Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
  • Re: Emacs ChangeLog generation and commit messages Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Emacs ChangeLog generation and commit messages Martin Jambor
• "subscribe LISTNAME" 三和田 将人 via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231105 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231104 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Advice on how to disable floating point instructions Enrico via Gcc
  • Re: Advice on how to disable floating point instructions Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Advice on how to disable floating point instructions Enrico via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231103 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about the changing the default behavior of ipa-inline Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• Discussion about arm testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
  • Re: Discussion about arm/aarch64 testcase failures seen with patch for PR111673 Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231102 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Suboptimal warning formatting with `bool` type in C peter0x44 via Gcc
  • Re: Suboptimal warning formatting with `bool` type in C Joseph Myers
  • Re: Suboptimal warning formatting with `bool` type in C peter0x44 via Gcc
  • Re: Suboptimal warning formatting with `bool` type in C David Brown via Gcc
• Re: GCC support addition for Safety compliances Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Suspecting a wrong behavior in the value range propagation analysis for __builtin_clz Giuseppe Tagliavini via Gcc
  • Re: Suspecting a wrong behavior in the value range propagation analysis for __builtin_clz Jeff Law via Gcc
  • Re: Suspecting a wrong behavior in the value range propagation analysis for __builtin_clz Giuseppe Tagliavini via Gcc
  • Re: Suspecting a wrong behavior in the value range propagation analysis for __builtin_clz Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Suspecting a wrong behavior in the value range propagation analysis for __builtin_clz Joseph Myers
  • Re: Suspecting a wrong behavior in the value range propagation analysis for __builtin_clz Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• Question about function Split with va_args Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about function Split with va_args Richard Biener via Gcc
• Question on GIMPLE shifts Daniil Frolov
  • Re: Question on GIMPLE shifts Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Question on GIMPLE shifts Richard Biener via Gcc
• False positive misleading indentation warning Rene Kita
  • Re: False positive misleading indentation warning Martin Uecker
  • Re: False positive misleading indentation warning Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Subreg promotion not happening for the test case Vineet Gupta
• Help with clz(0) and optimization Enrico via Gcc
  • Re: Help with clz(0) and optimization Jeff Law via Gcc
• RISC-V V C Intrinsic API v1.0 release meeting reminder (October 30th, 2023) Eop Chen via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231029 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231028 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Problem solved Jacob Navia via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231027 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Please link to my website https://ecards.hopespring.org.uk/ abdul
• Need some analyzer testcase help Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Need some analyzer testcase help David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: Need some analyzer testcase help Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• Request for update of documentation about `-mtune` LIU Hao via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231026 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Install page misses Bison prerequisite Simon Sobisch via Gcc
  • Re: Install page misses Bison prerequisite Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Install page misses Bison prerequisite Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• [no subject] wolf king via Gcc
• Question on replacing .MASK_STORE with ternary expressions Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question on replacing .MASK_STORE with ternary expressions Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question on replacing .MASK_STORE with ternary expressions Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question on replacing .MASK_STORE with ternary expressions Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• Inquiry about ARM gcc5 CVE-2023-4039 Patch 老小孩老小孩 via Gcc
  • Re: Inquiry about ARM gcc5 CVE-2023-4039 Patch Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] libcpp: add a function to determine UTF-8 validity of a C string David Malcolm via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] libcpp: add a function to determine UTF-8 validity of a C string Jason Merrill via Gcc
  • Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] libcpp: add a function to determine UTF-8 validity of a C string David Malcolm via Gcc
• Riscv code generation Jacob Navia via Gcc
  • Re: Riscv code generation Benny Lyne Amorsen
• gcc-14-20231022 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231021 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231020 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about the pass_fre about merging if blocks. Richard Biener via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231019 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Arm assembler crc issue Iain Sandoe
  • Re: Arm assembler crc issue Iain Sandoe
  • Re: Arm assembler crc issue Richard Sandiford via Gcc
  • Re: Arm assembler crc issue Iain Sandoe
• gcc 13.2 is missing warnings? Eric Sokolowsky via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 13.2 is missing warnings? Martin Uecker
  • Re: gcc 13.2 is missing warnings? Martin Uecker
  • Re: gcc 13.2 is missing warnings? Eric Gallager
  • Re: gcc 13.2 is missing warnings? Eric Sokolowsky via Gcc
  • Re: gcc 13.2 is missing warnings? Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
• [RISCV] RISC-V GNU Toolchain Monthly Sync-up call (Oct 19, 2023) jiawei
• Help needed in output relocations Rishi Raj via Gcc
  • Re: Help needed in output relocations Jan Hubicka via Gcc
• GCC 14.0.0 Status Report (2023-10-18), Stage 1 ends Nov. 19th Richard Biener via Gcc
• Check whether a function is a pure function Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Check whether a function is a pure function Richard Biener via Gcc
• Vectorizer for types with different size Li, Pan2 via Gcc
  • Re: Vectorizer for types with different size Richard Biener via Gcc
  • RE: Vectorizer for types with different size Li, Pan2 via Gcc
  • RE: Vectorizer for types with different size Li, Pan2 via Gcc
• gcc-14-20231015 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Re: Hints on reconfiguring GCC Iain Sandoe
  • Re: Hints on reconfiguring GCC Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: Hints on reconfiguring GCC R jd via Gcc
  • Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' (was: Hints on reconfiguring GCC) Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Andreas Schwab via Gcc
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Thomas Schwinge
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Eric Gallager
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc
  • Re: Enable top-level recursive 'autoreconf' Alexandre Oliva via Gcc
• gcc-13-20231014 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• Question about gimple code during optimizing if-conversion Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: Question about gimple code during optimizing if-conversion Andrew Pinski via Gcc
  • Re: Question about gimple code during optimizing if-conversion Jeff Law via Gcc
• gcc-12-20231013 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• gcc-11-20231012 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Hanke Zhang via Gcc
  • Re: the elimination of if blocks in GCC during if-conversion and vectorization Richard Biener via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages