On Mon, 8 Apr 2024, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> * Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira via Gcc: > > > + It's stable > > > > This is one of the things which makes Linux unique > > in the operating system landscape: applications > > can target the kernel directly. Unlike in virtually > > every other operating system out there, the Linux kernel > > to user space binary interface is documented[2] as stable. > > Breaking it is considered a regression in the kernel. > > Therefore it makes sense for a compiler to target it. > > The same is not true for any other operating system. > > There is quite a bit of variance in how the kernel is entered. On > x86-64, one once popular mechanism is longer present in widely-used > kernels. I assume you're implicitly referencing the vsyscall mechanism, but on amd64 it's not useful to *enter the kernel*, right? It was useful for obtaining the result of certain syscalls without actually entering the kernel, like with vdso. Unlike i386, where the vdso (as well as vsyscall I guess) provides the __kernel_vsyscall entrypoint, which provides whichever of { int 0x80, sysenter, syscall } methods is available and fastest. Or am I missing something? Alexander