On 2022-10-23 13:09, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
[...] To be specific, gcc steering committee and glibc FSF stewards
have announced the decision for their projects [...]
I may be missing something. All I've seen so far were some of the
leaders of some of the projects being joint signatories to a letter on
overseers@. As far as I'm aware, that is not how any of these
projects make or announce **project decisions** with/to their
respective constituencies.
Fair enough.
I am not aware of any opposition from maintainers of libabigail or
cygwin or any other active sourceware based project over moving
either, but I haven't had any links to those projects, so I may be
uninformed.
Indeed. The onus is obviously on the shoulders of the proponents of
this proposal to convince each sourceware guest project to consent to
move. If you wish to frame any dissent as "blocking full migration",
then I'd say the job of convincing everyone just has not been up to
par. Perhaps it was the wrong goal all along.
Are you saying then that your dissent so far is as maintainer for
systemtap and not as an overseer?
Sid
