On 2022-10-04 15:05, Mark Wielaard wrote:
I did indeed. Both the proposal and these minutes mention migrating
websites without mentioning any specifics. Knowing which websites are
meant and why they need migration is useful information.
The FSF tech team is helping us coordinating things on overseers to
help with release archives, mirroring, backups and sourceware
continuity. If this is about migrating websites currently on
www.gnu.org then talking to the FSF tech team does make sense. If it
isn't about that, then we will simply note that and move one.
We do take this proposal, and all other suggestions people make about
the sourceware infrastructure, seriously, but a lot of details of this
proposal are still unclear. We are trying to get as much details as
possible so we can see how this fits into the current sourceware
roadmap, get a better understanding of the budgetary needs, file
sourceware infrastructure bugs with those details. All to get a better
understanding what the real needs are and document the necessary steps
forward.
I had in fact missed the websites mention, sorry I overreacted to your
comment. In that case, I don't know if the GNU websites are actually
part of this proposal.
Sid
