Erick my friend, That's exactly why I'm such a big fan of creating things anew each time I mess with them. 😉
Later, Gary ________________________________ From: Erick Ochoa <eoc...@gcc.gnu.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 7:29 AM To: Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> Subject: Re: Question on updating function body on specialized functions Hi Martin! Thanks for replying, turns out that while I was trying to reply to you I was able to get the answer. Turns out there is indeed one tree node which is shared across the two functions. And that is TREE_OPERAND (MEM_REF, 1). When I was assigning to TREE_TYPE ( TREE_OPERAND (MEM_REF, 1) ) in one function, I was modifying the other. The solution was to create a new tree and assign it directly to TREE_OPERAND (MEM_REF, 1) in both functions. Thanks!
