On 3/2/2022 05:49, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 01/03/2022 16:23, Kinsey Moore wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at working on Cortex-R5F support for RTEMS, but it seems
as if latest GCC supports the Cortex-R5. This R5 has implicit FPU
support which would make it really R5F. The ARM reference page on
this core (https://developer.arm.com/Processors/Cortex-R5) specifies
that the FPU is optional. I see that the FPU support can probably be
disabled using the nofp option to achieve Cortex-R5 support, but I
was wondering why this is handled differently from the Cortex-R4[F]
support since that is broken out into two different CPU entries in
gcc/config/arm/arm-cpus.in. It appears that R7 and R8 are handled the
same way as R5.
Is the R4/R4F just the legacy way of handling this and R5/7/8 are the
new way?
Arm no-longer gives distinct product names for products that come in
multiple guises. Another example of this is that many armv8-a
products have an optional crypto unit but have the same product name.
So to answer your question more directly, the -mcpu=cortex-r5 will by
default be considered to have an FPU, provided that the compiler was
built with --with-fpu=auto (the default). If you specify
--with-float-abi=soft, then even if the product has an FPU, or for
some cases a SIMD unit, then these will never be used. So I'd recommend:
For FP support: -mcpu=cortex-r5 -mfloat-abi=hard
For no FP support: -mcpu=cortex-r5 -mfloat-abi=soft
There's also a mid-way variant of -mcpu=cortex-r5 -mfloat-abi=softfp,
which would use the FP hardware but use the soft-float calling
conventions; this code is abi-compatible with the no-fp variant above.
Ah, ok. Thanks for that info. I guess ARM or their downstream vendors
are just inconsistent about naming of those cores since I'm seeing R5F
references in official documentation from the downstream vendors.
Kinsey
