Gabriel, Yes, indeed, thank you.
Note, it is a reminder to those that are receiving proprietary and that is considered as a legal obligation on the part of the company transmitting it because they must make an effort to protect their proprietary information. I'm not a lawyer either but I feel like I'm being forced to act like one. 😉 Now, can anybody answer my question? Sincerely Gary ________________________________ From: Gabriel Ravier <gabrav...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:56 AM To: Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz>; Gary Oblock <g...@amperecomputing.com>; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero [EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.] On 1/7/22 09:38, Martin Liška wrote: > On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote: >> Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic >> and not under my control also we're not supposed to >> use private emails for work... > > I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your > emails any longer. I don't want to follow the conditions in the NOTICE! > > Cheers, > Martin > As far as I know the notice has no legal significance at all (which Gary should probably point out to his management. Really, pretty much the only thing the disclaimer will do is that _some_ people _might_ read it and _some_ of those people _might_ adhere to the terms given there, which is basically meaningless compared to the general annoyance resulting from disclaimers being at the end of e-mails everywhere). You can't just magically establish an agreement that results in a duty of nondisclosure like this without agreement, and just receiving an email obviously isn't that. (although ironically, I guess I should add a disclaimer of my own: I ain't a lawyer and this isn't legal advice)
