Martin,

Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic
and not under my control also we're not supposed to
use private emails for work...

Gary
________________________________
From: Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz>
Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:20 AM
To: Gary Oblock <g...@amperecomputing.com>; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please 
be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection 
practices.]


On 1/7/22 09:10, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote:
> An optimization flag that I recently added is being
> set to zero in push_cfun (which after a couple of
> levels of calls cl_optimization_restore to this.)

Question is: what's the value of the flag in your IPA pass
if you set -finterleaving-index-32-bits? It should not really be zero.

>
> The flag defined like this:
>
> finterleaving-index-32-bits
> Common Var(flag_interleaving_index_32_bits) Init(0) Optimization
> Structure reorganization optimization, instance interleaving.
>
> Note, I'm working around this but l'd really like
> to not have to do so therefore I'm wondering if somebody
> could explain what's happening and what I'd need
> to do instead?

You defined the flag well.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains information that 
> is confidential and proprietary to Ampere Computing or its subsidiaries. It 
> is to be used solely for the purpose of furthering the parties' business 
> relationship. Any unauthorized review, copying, or distribution of this email 
> (or any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently 
> delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.

Can you please remove this ugly notice that it's completely misleading? If not, 
I would then
recommend creating a private email.

Martin

Reply via email to