Hi, > See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=100854 .
I found that, indeed, but what I struggle to see is: this behaviour of __FLT_EVAL_METHOD__ has been around for several years now, so why aren’t there more tests failing? I’m not sure what the fix should be, either. We could use fixinclude to make the darwin headers happy, but we don’t really have a macro to provide the right value. Like a __FLT_EVAL_METHOD_OLDSTYLE__ macro. What should be the float_t and double_t types for FLT_EVAL_METHOD == 16? float and double, if I understand right? FX
