On Wed, 15 Dec 2021 at 12:22, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > On 15.12.21 12:39, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > > > Iain pointed out a drawback of not having the regression info in the > > Summary. Currently it does draw your attention when looking at the > > results of a bugzilla search. Andrew noted that bug aliases are > > automatically added to the summary, e.g. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR94404 > > shows its alias "(c++core-issues)". > Wouldn't it be easier to click on the "[Change Columns]" button at the > bottom of the search result page and add the new field to the "Selected > Columns"? The known-to-(work/fail) columns are available, i.e. this > feature also works with custom fields.
Yes, I'd be fine with that solution (thanks, for the reminder, I should have mentioned that option in my initial mail). If you reorder the "known to fail" column so it comes right before the Summary column you would get a clear list of regressions shown before the rest of the summary (and nothing in that column for non-regressions). A possible downside is that would show all the branches the regression was on, including closed ones. Again, I'd be fine with that, but it's a change from the info visible at a glance in the Summary today.
