We have a pre-implementation trial, although it is not very extensive. We intend to develop this during gsoc and take it forward in a planned manner.
David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com>, 5 Oca 2021 Sal, 22:45 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > Are you trying to propose a JavaScript / TypeScript front-end and > associated runtime for GCC? > > I don't believe that anyone would object to that. It probably is much > too ambitious for a GSoC project. You could propose a subset as a > GSoC project. > > It's unclear if you already have a preliminary implementation and want > to incrementally continue it, like a Hackathon, as part of GSoC. > > Thanks, David > > On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 2:34 PM Alper G. via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > I wanted to talk about a gcc front-end with the syntax js / ts, which is > > ahead-of-time. The standard library will also contain basic functions > that > > will enable the use of several basic frameworks that can be used in > > standard output. It was an e-mail that I could not fully explain because > I > > tried to correct the text a few times, I'm sorry :) We are a group of > > several people who have already worked on compiler design and we thought > of > > applying this idea under the name gcc. > > > > Martin Jambor <mjam...@suse.cz>, 4 Oca 2021 Pzt, 17:37 tarihinde şunu > yazdı: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 27 2020, Alper G. via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hello, I am waiting for your suggestions and evaluations about an > idea > > > that > > > > I am thinking about applying to this year's event of google gsoc. In > > > short, > > > > I can say about myself that I am an engineering student and worked on > > > > compilers as well as several different fields. Nowadays, we see that > > > > scripting languages such as javascript / typescript are more than > just a > > > > client-side language in the browser. In order to develop > applications on > > > > desktop and mobile devices, there are alternatives such as electron > that > > > > contain chromium and nodejs, have multi-disk-size requirements and > cannot > > > > be packaged statically before runtime, such as react-native. In > order to > > > > overcome such problems, it is necessary to create the ahead-of-time > > > > compilation, which we are familiar with such as c / c ++, according > to > > > this > > > > syntax and standards, and to call the graphics libraries and system > calls > > > > directly from within js. Therefore, I want to create a subset of gcc > that > > > > can be statically compiled and contains the ecmascript standards > required > > > > to run common js frameworks native. What are your comments on this > > > > idea? > > > > > > I'm afraid I don't understand it at all. Making GCC "run common js > > > frameworks" makes very little sense to me. Are you proposing some kind > > > of JavaScript Front-end (which is not a JIT)? > > > > > > > What can we say about the acceptability for gsoc? > > > > > > Well, unfortunately I can say only that I do not understand it. If it > > > is the JavaScript Front-end, the project would too big for a GSoC, by > > > orders of magnitude, even if severely reduced in scope. > > > > > > Martin > > > >
