On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 17:02, Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > While checking recent test results I noticed many posts with results > for various flavors of arm that at high level seem like duplicates > of one another. > > For example, the batch below all have the same title, but not all > of the contents are the same. The details (such as test failures) > on some of the pages are different. > > Can you help explain the differences? Is there a way to avoid > the duplication? >
Sure, I am aware that many results look the same... If you look at the top of the report (~line 5), you'll see: Running target myarm-sim Running target myarm-sim/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-m3/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv7-m Running target myarm-sim/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-m0/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv6s-m Running target myarm-sim/-mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7ve+simd Running target myarm-sim/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-m7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7e-m+fp.dp Running target myarm-sim/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-m4/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7e-m+fp Running target myarm-sim/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-m33/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8-m.main+fp+dsp Running target myarm-sim/-mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv7ve+simd Running target myarm-sim/-mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7ve+simd For all of these, the first line of the report is: LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 22 09:39:18 UTC 2020 (revision r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c) TARGET=arm-none-eabi CPU=default FPU=default MODE=default I have other combinations where I override the configure flags, eg: LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 22 11:25:12 UTC 2020 (revision r9-8928-gb3043e490896ea37cd0273e6e149c3eeb3298720) TARGET=arm-none-linux-gnueabihf CPU=cortex-a9 FPU=neon-fp16 MODE=thumb I tried to see if I could fit something in the subject line, but that didn't seem convenient (would be too long, and I fear modifying the awk script....) I think HJ generates several "running targets" in the same log, I run them separately to benefit from the compute farm I have access to. Christophe > Thanks > Martin > > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON > Results for 11.0.0 20200922 (experimental) [master revision > r11-3343-g44135373fcdbe4019c5524ec3dff8e93d9ef113c] (GCC) testsuite on > arm-none-eabi Christophe LYON
