On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:17 PM Thomas Koenig via Fortran <fort...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > For now, I would recommend doing 1:1 backports. Otherwise, you'll need > > to merge > > all ChangeLog entries in a format the server hook accepts. That can > > require some > > work. > > If the first commit caused a regression, which the second one fixed, > this would keep the first regression, right? Is that what we want?
IMHO squashing is preferred. Is it really so hard to do that? You'll get concatenated ChangeLogs you have to merge manually, sure. So what? Just do it ;) Maybe the scripts even accept "duplicates" and you only have to edit out the duplicate date/author headers. Richard. > Regards > > Thomas
