On 5/1/20 10:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:23:33AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
On 4/30/20 11:21 PM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
The first release candidate for GCC 10.1 is available from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.1.0-RC-20200430/
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/10.1.0-RC-20200430
What about naming these 10.1.0-rc1?
This is naming that has been used for year, I just keep forgetting what
exact -r argument to pass for the RCs, and the RC and date part come
from the script. Due to the versioning conventions,
BASE-VER can't be 10.1.0 yet, because there is no release, but the filenames
in this case contain RC.
I see.
and shortly its mirrors. It has been generated from git revision
r10-8080-g591d857164c37cd0bb96da2a293148e01f280e0f.
Can we also use proper git tags for it please?
Is it worth it?
Probably not.
RCs are something of interest just for the week at most and
then forgotten, the releases is what matters and that is properly tagged
(including signing).
Works for me,
Martin
Jakub
