On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 18:02, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 16:46, Christopher Faylor via Gcc > <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:13:13PM +0200, Olivier Hainque wrote: > > >Hi Frank, > > > > > >> On 23 Apr 2020, at 16:34, Frank Ch. Eigler <f...@elastic.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi - > > >> > > >>>> A re-subscription attempt to the gcc mailing list just > > >>>> failed, expectedly I guess. > > >> > > >> I see no sign in the logs of Olivier being banned in any form. Please > > >> resubscribe online and forward complete failure symptoms if you > > >> believe this is still happening. > > > > > >Thanks for your feedback! > > > > > >I managed to subscribe again by going through the gcc > > >list specific info page :-) > > > > > >My previous attempts were issued from > > > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html#subscribe > > > > > >Subscribing from there doesn't work and leads > > >to a page which provides instructions which don't work > > >either. > > > > > >From there I thought the coincidence was troubling. > > > > > >There is actually a FAQ link on the instructions page, > > >which I just checked, and ... it directs to a 404 page: > > > > > > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/index.html#faqs > > > > > >I'll try to re-subscribe to gcc-patches now. > > > > All of the above is handled by whomever is responsible for the > > gcc web pages. It would be nice if someone fixed those links. > > Yes, removing the broken subcription form on gcc.gnu.org/lists.html is > on my TODO list, but gcc-10 work is higher priority.
Patch submitted for approval now: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-April/544461.html
