We can setup a command line interface, maybe using CURSES, I mean GUIs are
fun, but Jesus Christ they’re full of surprises

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:35 PM Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlin...@hotmail.de>
wrote:

> On 4/2/20 1:41 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 at 23:54, Joseph Myers wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 1 Apr 2020, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> >>
> >>> PS: I have a discovered a very serious problem with the mailing lists
> >>> that must be fixed by our overseers.
> >>>
> >>> That is the scubbed attachments.
> >>>
> >>> As an example please look at this one:
> >>> https://marc.info/?l=gdb-patches&m=158571308379946&w=2
> >>
> >> The copy of that message I received from gdb-patches by email appears to
> >> have the attachment intact.  I don't know where marc.info got the
> message
> >> from, but it doesn't seem to be by email from the list.
> >
> > The sourceware.org archive also has an HTTP (not HTTPS) link for that
> > attachment:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-March/166601.html
> >
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> But when I serach "bernd.edlinger" in marc.info I see *every* message
> I sent to the gcc-patches since 2013 and each of them has an attachment,
> and it is available per https from marc.info, not sourceware.org,
> that is insane to assume that marc.info would store attachments on
> sourceware.org, the only logical explanation is that sourceware.org
> changed the e-mail and removed the attachment and forwarded a different
> version of the e-mail to marc.info.
>
> Regarding the overseers, they repeatedly spoke up on this list,
> but all the time they use an e-mail that bounces.
> I'd call that impolite.  If you know how to reach them, please
> make them aware of this issue, because it is a security relevant
> issue.  Seriously.
>
>
> Bernd.
>

Reply via email to