On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > git-svn did not miss any branches. Finding branches is not done by > git-svn at all, for this. These branches were skipped because they > have nothing to do with GCC, have no history in common (they are not > descendants of revision 1). They can easily be added -- Maxim might
Whether they have history in common is, in the case of libstdcxx_so_7-2-branch, a subjective question (that branch was created in SVN by creating the directory for the branch, then copying just the libstdc++-v3 subdirectory, so that subdirectory does have history in common with trunk). In fact I've seen it go, in the reposurgeon conversion, from being an orphan branch to a non-orphan and back again, as details of the exact handling of empty commits (a commit that only created the directory for the branch, in this case) changed (and I've wondered about making the reposurgeon conversion explicitly reparent the commit that copies the libstdc++-v3 subdirectory, on the basis that being connected to the main history of trunk is more useful than not being so connected). -- Joseph S. Myers j...@polyomino.org.uk
