On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 01:43:48PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 11:29 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > > > > Should we go with the gcc-reparent.git repo now? > > > > > > I think we should go with the reposurgeon conversion, with all Richard's > > > improvements to commit messages. gcc-reparent.git has issues of its own; > > > at least, checking the list of branches shows some branches are missing. > > You need to provide proof of that.
classpath-generics gcj/classpath-095-import-branch libstdcxx_so_7-2-branch st/binutils st/mono-based-binutils. There are also tags in the GCC SVN repository in /branches/st/tags, some of which are missing in the conversion and the rest of which are in refs/heads/ when refs/tags/ would be more appropriate. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
