"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <richard.earns...@arm.com> writes: > The real question at this point is whether or not these commit summaries > are better than the existing ones. Personally, I think they are (or I > wouldn't have spent the time working on this), but I'm not the only > person with an interest here...
+1 for having this (not that it's a vote). Of the two extremes, the git-svn squashed-clog summaries aren't readable and something ultra-conservative like "SVN commit rNNNNN" wouldn't be useful in --oneline output. The scripted summaries seem like a nice compromise between the two. I don't think it matters if the script happens to generate a few misleading summaries here and there, given that it preserves the original message as well. Thanks, Richard
