Hi, On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 10:54:17AM +0000, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > - author attributions are sometimes incorrect - reported
This would disqualify that "conversion", for me at least. Keeping all warts we had in SVN is better than adding new lies, lies about important matters even. > - certain key words in otherwise not very useful summary lines are > also spotted and used to add [revert] or [backport] annotations to > the summary. You won't see tags like that from anyone who uses the normal git commit flows: the piece of the mail subject between [] is deleted. > No changes are made to the main commit log, if we add a new summary > line, the entire original text is kept. That is good (an important requirement even). Segher
