> > > > Whereas the most recent reported results (10.0.0 20191118) show > > > > only 2 > > > unexpected failures and no unexpected successes in the gcc summary. > > > > > > Which results are you looking at? > > > Two failures sounds very low, it's probably not running the guality > > > tests which usually fail. > > > > > I searched the mailing list for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu to make sure I was > > comparing apples to apples, and this was the most recent report: > > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc. > > gnu.org%2Fml%2Fgcc-testresults%2F2019- > 11%2Fmsg01190.html&data=02%7 > > > C01%7CAndrew.Dean%40microsoft.com%7Cb89abb6ea9f34a0916d908d76ed0 > 3783%7 > > > C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637099712871926073 > &sda > > > ta=KooYFswCjKMaV%2FQ3D6tc03WAej8MfQ4Zl9H9kjtR%2B6Y%3D&rese > rved=0 > > Yes, I thought you might be looking at that one. That has: > # of unsupported tests 7126 > which seems high. Here's a more typical set of results: > https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgcc.gnu > .org%2Fml%2Fgcc-testresults%2F2019- > 11%2Fmsg01255.html&data=02%7C01%7CAndrew.Dean%40microsoft.co > m%7Cb89abb6ea9f34a0916d908d76ed03783%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7c > d011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637099712871926073&sdata=ujcoGkSL45wodz > A50F7NvlyHPGzt8MKnTQbUzye3JIw%3D&reserved=0 > > The one you looked at is built on an EC2 instance, so might be missing > something (GDB?) needed for the guality tests. > > So I don't think you're doing anything wrong, you just got unlucky and looked > at > one which skips most of the tests that are failing for you.
Thanks for your help!
