On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:49:36AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > With the SVN repo going read-only it becomes our fallback plan in case > of major unexpected problems. > > Joseph's recommendation for having the old objects/refs in the new repo > makes a lot of sense. So if it works, it's got my support as well.
That potentially (and probably) makes the repository a lot bigger. Better test that before deciding to do this. > Anyway, just wanted to chime in with my support for the plan and make it > clear that as long as we get a conversion that is as good as or better > than the mirror is now that I'll be happy :-) Yup. And if everyone would use it, that already makes it better than the mirror. Segher
