> I think you should have at least four tests of sign of zero result
> (arguments -0.5, -0.0, 0.0 and 0.5). Probably also tests of values
> between +/- 0.5 and 0, e.g. test -0.25 and 0.25 as well.
Okay, I have made the following changes and again, the tests pass for roundeven.
void
real_roundeven (REAL_VALUE_TYPE *r, format_helper fmt,
const REAL_VALUE_TYPE *x)
{
if (is_halfway_below (x))
{
/* Special case as -0.5 rounds to -0.0 and
similarly +0.5 rounds to +0.0. */
if (REAL_EXP (x) == 0)
{
*r = *x;
clear_significand_below (r, SIGNIFICAND_BITS);
}
else
{
do_add (r, x, &dconsthalf, x->sign);
if (!is_even (r))
do_add (r, r, &dconstm1, x->sign);
}
if (fmt)
real_convert (r, fmt, r);
}
else
real_round (r, fmt, x);
}
Tests :
/* { dg-do link } */
extern int link_error (int);
#define TEST(FN, VALUE, RESULT) \
if (__builtin_##FN (VALUE) != RESULT) link_error (__LINE__);
int
main (void)
{
TEST(roundeven, 0, 0);
TEST(roundeven, 0.5, 0);
TEST(roundeven, -0.5, 0);
TEST(roundeven, 6, 6);
TEST(roundeven, -8, -8);
TEST(roundeven, 2.5, 2);
TEST(roundeven, 3.5, 4);
TEST(roundeven, -1.5, -2);
TEST(roundeven, 3.499, 3);
TEST(roundeven, 3.501, 4);
if (__builtin_copysign (1, __builtin_roundeven (-0.5)) != -1)
link_error (__LINE__);
if (__builtin_copysign (1, __builtin_roundeven (-0.0)) != -1)
link_error (__LINE__);
if (__builtin_copysign (-1, __builtin_roundeven (0.5)) != 1)
link_error (__LINE__);
if (__builtin_copysign (-1, __builtin_roundeven (0.0)) != 1)
link_error (__LINE__);
if (__builtin_copysign (1, __builtin_roundeven (-0.25)) != -1)
link_error (__LINE__);
if (__builtin_copysign (-1, __builtin_roundeven (0.25)) != 1)
link_error (__LINE__);
return 0;
}
Thanks,
Tejas
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 22:05, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2019, Tejas Joshi wrote:
>
> > > I'm concerned that this would produce +0.0 for an argument of -0.5 (via
> > > -0.5 - 0.5 - -1.0 producing +0.0) when it needs to produce -0.0.
> >
> > Would the following overhaul be acceptable as the condition is
> > specialized for -0.5 and +0.5 only. This seems to solve the problem. I
> > did test the roundeven tests and it passes the tests.
>
> I think that would be reasonable with a comment added to explain that it's
> ensuring the correct sign of a zero result.
>
> > if (__builtin_copysign (1, __builtin_roundeven (-0.5)) != -1)
> > link_error (__LINE__);
>
> I think you should have at least four tests of sign of zero result
> (arguments -0.5, -0.0, 0.0 and 0.5). Probably also tests of values
> between +/- 0.5 and 0, e.g. test -0.25 and 0.25 as well.
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> jos...@codesourcery.com
