Dell Customer Communication - Confidential

> From: Martin Liška <[email protected]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 5:12 AM
> To: taylor, david; [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: gcc: -ftest-coverage and -auxbase
> 
> On 6/19/19 7:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch.  Standalone it is not sufficient.  Combined with
> > the other two changes that have been discussed --
> 
> Why is that not sufficient? If you build from top-level and you have .o files
> that overwrite each other, then you can set -fprofile-note-dir=/tmp/my-
> unique-folder
> 
> And you'll not overwrite .gcno files.
> 
> Martin

Right now GCC names the GCNO files '-.gcno'.

With your patch they get put into a specified directory.  But,
unless I am prepared to create over 16,000 directories each to
hold just one file (I'm not), it is not sufficient.

What I want to do -- unless it is going to create problems -- is
to place the notes files alongside the object files.  The files
foo.o and foo.gcno would be in the same directory.

Reply via email to