Hello! I just chose the word "unmatched" for now.. let me know if "stray" or some other word is better. :-)
I have a work in progress patch that as far as I can tell works. I wonder if you see some problems with my design. What do I need to do..? Basically I have chosen to add a nesting_depth to the c_parser struct. That is updated in the consume_token. I first tried to add such variable in c_parser_declaration_or_fndef() but that was much more difficult. I wanted to warn about unmatched }. It is however more complicated than I thought. For two reasons: The first reason is the hard problem, but maybe we can ignore this now also: void f() { } // <- looking at the indentation, it seems preferable to warn about this } The second reason is easier.. I just don't want to get into too deep water too quickly. To warn about that also I can't just have a nesting_depth anymore. I need to have a stack that track the nesting. I have experimented with a linked list like this and made it work: struct nesting { cpp_ttype type; struct nesting *next; }; but well here I run into memory management and I also wonder if you like the design decision to put a linked list in the c_parser struct. Here is my current patch... diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.c b/gcc/c/c-parser.c index 972b629c092..eabc5ffa15e 100644 --- a/gcc/c/c-parser.c +++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.c @@ -171,6 +171,8 @@ struct GTY(()) c_parser { /* How many look-ahead tokens are available (0 - 4, or more if parsing from pre-lexed tokens). */ unsigned int tokens_avail; + /* nesting depth in expression (parentheses / squares) */ + unsigned int nesting_depth; /* True if a syntax error is being recovered from; false otherwise. c_parser_error sets this flag. It should clear this flag when enough tokens have been consumed to recover from the error. */ @@ -763,6 +765,22 @@ c_parser_next_tokens_start_declaration (c_parser *parser) return false; } +/* Nesting start token */ + +static bool c_parser_is_nesting_start (c_parser *parser) +{ + return c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_PAREN) || + c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_OPEN_SQUARE); +} + +/* Nesting end token */ + +static bool c_parser_is_nesting_end (c_parser *parser) +{ + return c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_CLOSE_PAREN) || + c_parser_next_token_is (parser, CPP_CLOSE_SQUARE); +} + /* Consume the next token from PARSER. */ void @@ -772,6 +790,10 @@ c_parser_consume_token (c_parser *parser) gcc_assert (parser->tokens[0].type != CPP_EOF); gcc_assert (!parser->in_pragma || parser->tokens[0].type != CPP_PRAGMA_EOL); gcc_assert (parser->error || parser->tokens[0].type != CPP_PRAGMA); + if (c_parser_is_nesting_start (parser)) + parser->nesting_depth++; + else if (parser->nesting_depth > 0 && c_parser_is_nesting_end (parser)) + parser->nesting_depth--; parser->last_token_location = parser->tokens[0].location; if (parser->tokens != &parser->tokens_buf[0]) parser->tokens++; @@ -1673,6 +1695,20 @@ add_debug_begin_stmt (location_t loc) add_stmt (stmt); } +static bool c_parser_unmatched_p (c_parser *parser) +{ + if (c_parser_is_nesting_end (parser)) + return parser->nesting_depth == 0; + return false; +} + +static void complain_about_unmatched_token (c_parser *parser) +{ + c_token *token = c_parser_peek_token(parser); + error_at (token->location, "unmatched %<%s%>", + cpp_type2name(token->type, token->flags)); +} + /* Parse a declaration or function definition (C90 6.5, 6.7.1, C99 6.7, 6.9.1, C11 6.7, 6.9.1). If FNDEF_OK is true, a function definition is accepted; otherwise (old-style parameter declarations) only other @@ -2228,7 +2264,10 @@ c_parser_declaration_or_fndef (c_parser *parser, bool fndef_ok, } else { - c_parser_error (parser, "expected %<,%> or %<;%>"); + if (c_parser_unmatched_p (parser)) + complain_about_unmatched_token (parser); + else + c_parser_error (parser, "expected %<,%> or %<;%>"); c_parser_skip_to_end_of_block_or_statement (parser); return; } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unmatched.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unmatched.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bd458a01109 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/unmatched.c @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ + +/* { dg-do compile } */ + +void f1() { + int a = 0)+3; /* { dg-error "unmatched" } */ +} + +void f2() { + int b = (1]+3; /* { dg-error "expected" } */ +} + +void f3() { + int b = 1]+3; /* { dg-error "unmatched" } */ +} + +void f4() { + int c = (1))+3; /* { dg-error "unmatched" } */ +} + Best regards, Daniel Marjamäki