On 2018-12-01 10:32 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 20:54, Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> This adds the remainging noexcept causes required for this cause
>> to meet the spec as dicussed last year and documented here:
>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2899.
>
> This isn't "the spec", it's a proposed (but incorrect) resolution to a
> defect in the standard. What it proposes may not fix the defect, but I
> think it's an improvement to the std::tuple API anyway, and so I want
> libstdc++ to implement it. "The spec" is the C++ standard, but it
> explicitly allows implementations to add stronger
> exception-specifications where a function is known not to throw.
>
> Thanks for the patch. Something this small could be accepted without a
> copyright assignment, but as it seems like you're interested in
> contributing more (which is great!) you should be aware of the legal
> prerequisites for larger contributions (which also applies to several
> small contributions, even if each one is trivial). See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html for details, and let me know if
> you have any questions about that.
>
Jonathan,
My only question remains is for copyright is it per patch or just one time.
My other question is related to the noexcept parts and that either I or
you should move and CC the other involed list i.e. the llibstdc++ list.
Cheers,
Nick
