On 11/1/18 8:40 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi Peter, > > On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 11/1/18 7:25 PM, Paul Koning wrote: >>> I'm running the testsuite on the pdp11 target, and I get a failure when >>> using LRA that works correctly with the old allocator. The issue is that >>> LRA is producing an insn that is invalid (it violates the constraints >>> stated in the insn definition). >> [snip] >>> which is the correct sequence given the matching operand constraint in the >>> define_insn. >>> >>> Is this an LRA bug, or is there something I need to do in the target to >>> prevent this happening? >> >> What do you mean by "old allocator"? > > I think Paul just means old reload.
In that case, my patch may still help. Peter
