> The Ranger is far enough along now that we have confidence in both its > approach and ability to perform, and would like to solicit feedback on > what you think of it, any questions, possible uses, as well as > potential requirements to integrate with trunk later this stage.
The PDF document mentions that you first intended to support symbolic ranges but eventually dropped them as "too complex, and ultimately not necessary". I don't entirely disagree with the former part, but I'm curious about the latter part: how do you intent to deal in the long term with cases that do require symbolic information to optimize things? The TODO page seems to acknowledge the loophole but only mentions a plan to deal with equivalences, which is not sufficient in the general case (as acknowledged too on the page). -- Eric Botcazou
