On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > I understand the need for .quick_push(), when we know the size of the > allocated elements before hand, but do we really need to call the > common variant safe_push? Can't we just call it push()? > > Or is there some magic C++ rule/idiom that prohibits us from doing this? > > I volunteer to provide a patch if y'all agree.
I think having quick_push and safe_push makes you think which one to use while push would be the obvious lazy one. Aka nobody thinks of pre-allocating stuff and using quick_push anymore. Just my 2 cents... Richard. > Aldy
