On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 19:04 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> 
> LRA is easier to work with than old reload, and that makes it better
> maintainable.
> 
> Making LRA handle everything reload did is work, and someone needs to
> do it.
> 
> LRA probably needs a few more target hooks (a _few_) to guide its
> decisions.

Like Georg-Johann mentioned before, LRA has been targeted mainly for
mainstream ISAs.  And actually it's a pretty reasonable choice.  Again,
I don't think that "one RA to rule them all" is a scalable approach.
 But that's just my opinion.

Cheers,
Oleg

Reply via email to