On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 19:04 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > LRA is easier to work with than old reload, and that makes it better > maintainable. > > Making LRA handle everything reload did is work, and someone needs to > do it. > > LRA probably needs a few more target hooks (a _few_) to guide its > decisions.
Like Georg-Johann mentioned before, LRA has been targeted mainly for mainstream ISAs. And actually it's a pretty reasonable choice. Again, I don't think that "one RA to rule them all" is a scalable approach. But that's just my opinion. Cheers, Oleg