Hello!
I've got a project which - when compiled with "arm-none-eabi" GCC 7.1
without optimizations - produces quite a lot of such messages:
-- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 --
In file included from
../../include/distortos/internal/scheduler/SoftwareTimerList.hpp:17:0,
from
../../include/distortos/internal/scheduler/SoftwareTimerSupervisor.hpp:15,
from SoftwareTimerSupervisor.cpp:12:
../../include/estd/SortedIntrusiveList.hpp: In static member function 'static
estd::SortedIntrusiveList<Compare, T, NodePointer, U>::iterator
estd::SortedIntrusiveList<Compare, T, NodePointer,
U>::erase(estd::SortedIntrusiveList<Compare, T, NodePointer, U>::iterator)
[with Compare = distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerAscendingTimePoint; T =
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode; estd::IntrusiveListNode T::*
NodePointer = &distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode::node; U =
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerControlBlock]':
../../include/estd/SortedIntrusiveList.hpp:257:18: note: parameter passing for
argument of type 'const iterator {aka const
estd::IntrusiveListIterator<distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode,
&distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode::node,
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerControlBlock>}' changed in GCC 7.1
static iterator erase(const iterator position)
^~~~~
...
In file included from
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/stl_algobase.h:71:0,
from
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/char_traits.h:39,
from
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/ios:40,
from
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/ostream:38,
from
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/iterator:64,
from ../../include/estd/IntrusiveList.hpp:15,
from
../../include/distortos/internal/scheduler/SoftwareTimerListNode.hpp:17,
from
../../include/distortos/internal/scheduler/SoftwareTimerList.hpp:15,
from
../../include/distortos/internal/scheduler/SoftwareTimerSupervisor.hpp:15,
from SoftwareTimerSupervisor.cpp:12:
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/predefined_ops.h:
In member function 'bool
__gnu_cxx::__ops::_Iter_pred<_Predicate>::operator()(_Iterator) [with _Iterator
= estd::IntrusiveListIterator<distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode,
&distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode::node,
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerControlBlock>; _Predicate =
estd::SortedIntrusiveList<Compare, T, NodePointer,
U>::Implementation::findInsertPosition(estd::SortedIntrusiveList<Compare, T,
NodePointer, U>::const_reference) [with Compare =
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerAscendingTimePoint; T =
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode; estd::IntrusiveListNode T::*
NodePointer = &distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode::node; U =
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerControlBlock]::<lambda(const
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerControlBlock&)>]':
/home/freddie/arm-none-eabi-gcc-7.1.0-170503/arm-none-eabi/include/c++/7.1.0/bits/predefined_ops.h:282:2:
note: parameter passing for argument of type
'estd::IntrusiveListIterator<distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode,
&distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerListNode::node,
distortos::internal::SoftwareTimerControlBlock>' changed in GCC 7.1
operator()(_Iterator __it)
^~~~~~~~
-- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 -- >8 --
Some of the messages (like the first one above) are triggered by my
code, but some of them (like the second one above) are coming from
within libstdc++ headers.
As I mentioned earlier, the messages appear only if -O0 is selected -
for any other optimization level the messages are gone.
The problem here is that I have absolutely no idea what this message is
supposed to mean (; Should I somehow fix/change/improve the code? If
possible, I would like to change my code so that it doesn't trigger any
such notes, as this is very confusing for the users...
I tried searching for some more info, but just found a thread on this
mailing list with a patch that introduces these messages, however I did
not really understand how it relates to my code...
Thanks in advance for any info!
Regards,
FCh
