On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Patrick Palka <patr...@parcs.ath.cx> wrote:
> Though there are some inconsistencies regarding the inclusiveness of
> -Wall seeing as neither -Woverlength-strings nor -Wempty-body are
> enabled by -Wall even though they seemingly satisfy the criteria of
> -Wall more readily than -Wmisleading-indentation does.

We certainly don't want -Woverlength-strings in -Wall; that's a
pedantic portability warning, not a warning about code that is
probably incorrect.

There's an open BZ about -Wempty-body, bug 52961.

Jason

Reply via email to