On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Patrick Palka <patr...@parcs.ath.cx> wrote: > Though there are some inconsistencies regarding the inclusiveness of > -Wall seeing as neither -Woverlength-strings nor -Wempty-body are > enabled by -Wall even though they seemingly satisfy the criteria of > -Wall more readily than -Wmisleading-indentation does.
We certainly don't want -Woverlength-strings in -Wall; that's a pedantic portability warning, not a warning about code that is probably incorrect. There's an open BZ about -Wempty-body, bug 52961. Jason
