Hi Richard, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> writes:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Giuseppe Scrivano wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> We got 18 slots from Google. >> >> It is less than we expected so not everyone is going to be satisfied by >> the split below. >> >> We have time until next week (deadline April 20, 2016 at 20:59 CEST) >> to assign mentors to each project, but to give us time to review things, >> please do this as soon as possible. Please directly notify me off-list >> when you have assigned the mentors so I can check that in the web >> interface (I have not found a way in the new interface to look up this >> information without going through all the proposals). >> >> For each proposal, please be sure there is only one mentor assigned to >> it and that each project has total proposals with a mentor == Assigned >> slots. >> >> I have assigned these slots based on the number of mentors available for >> each project, but if you feel like giving away any slot to another >> project, please do it. > ... >> Name: GCC >> Assigned: 2 > > So it looks like we need to scrap one of the three GCC proposals > (currently all have Mentors "assigned" - well, not sure if > "want to mentor" counts as assigned). > > There's the GIMPLE FE, Addressing mode selection and replacing > libiberty with gnulib. > > To me the last one is least interesting (no observable effect to > users or developers). please let's discuss these things privately. I doubt someone is going to give a slot back as we got 4 less than what we requested, but if it happens, GCC can take it. Please notify me once two proposals get a mentor assigned and I'll mark them accepted. Regards, Giuseppe
