On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: > * H. J. Lu: > >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Florian Weimer <f...@deneb.enyo.de> wrote: >>> * H. J. Lu: >>> >>>> I created a mailing list to discuss Linux specific,.processor independent >>>> modification and extension of generic System V Application Binary >>>> Interface: >>>> >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/forum/linux-abi >>>> >>>> I will start to document existing Linux extensions, like STT_GNU_IFUNC. >>>> I will propose some new extensions soon. >>> >>> Why can't you use the existing C++ ABI list? Is there no overlap at >>> all? >>> >> : >> I wasn't referring to empty class >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00057.html > > But still there is going to be some overlap?
I was told that it didn't belong to C++ ABI. Please free feel to raise the this issue with C++ ABI group. >> I was referring to program properties: >> >> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/generic-abi/fyIXttIsYc8 > > This looks more like an ELF topic to me, not really ABI. > > Please discuss this on a GNU project list because it affects the > entire GNU project. > gABI is ELF and affects all users, including GNU project, of gABI. Linux-abi discusses Linux-specific extensions to gABI. It is for tools like compilers, assembler, linker and run-time. It isn't appropriate for any GNU project list. -- H.J.
