On February 5, 2016 3:27:17 PM GMT+01:00, Carlos Pita <carlosjosep...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I was saying that early inlining is not supposed to catch this case >> but IPA inlining. >> it shouldn't need to inline g early to end up inlining the calls to >sq. IPA CP >> should clone g for the case of it calling sq and then inlining should >> just do its job. > >Ok, I fully agree with that, forcing early inlining to trigger late >inlining is just a workaround. But there is still the fact that ipa >inlining is indeed inlining the compound literal case (despite ipa cp >failing there) while it's unable to inline the static const case that, >as I understand it, you don't seem to consider a missed oportunity for >ipa cp. So say you fix the "aggregate D.1772" scenario, I guess it >won't change anything regarding ipa inlining.
No, I thought it would inline that anyway... Richard. >Cheers >-- >Carlos
