On 16 September 2015 at 18:48, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Yes, I think so. "The kids" these days all want to use git, not svn. >> That's harder to do because you have to set up git *and* git-svn. > > Right. And I find that dealing with the mixture of git and git-svn to be a > real PITA.
OK, I was not aware of that since I use only svn. Then, I understand the point of the conversion. If only there was a svn-git... (I was assuming one only needs git-svn to commit to the main repo and that happens relatively rarely, and that local writes and remote reads would be done in the git mirror without using git-svn. I guess it is more complex than that.) Cheers, Manuel.
