>>> On 15.07.15 at 03:20, <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:13:06AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> (there doesn't seem >> to be a fix for this in gcc trunk either, which I originally expected I could >> simply backport). > > The configure.in->configure.ac rename happened over a year ago so I > guess this shows that not too many people use combined binutils+gcc > builds nowadays. I've always found combined binutils+gcc builds not > worth the bother compared to simply building and installing binutils > first, as Jim suggests.
That doesn't work well when you want to specifically avoid installing, instead running directly from the build tree. Jan
