On 06/06/2015 05:49 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Bootstrap fails on aarch64:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: gcc/cc1objplus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1obj-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs
warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/ira-costs.o differs
gcc/tree-sra.o differs
gcc/tree-parloops.o differs
gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.o differs
gcc/java/jcf-io.o differs
gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.o differs
The bootstrap comparison failure on ppc64le, aarch64, and possibly
others is due to the order of some sections being in a different order
with and without debugging.
Stage2 is being compiled with no debugging due to -gtoggle, and stage3
is being compiled with debugging.
For ira-costs.o on ppc64le we have:
-Disassembly of section
.rodata._ZN10hash_tableI19cost_classes_hasher11xcallocatorE6expandEv.str1.8:
+Disassembly of section
.rodata._ZN10hash_tableI19cost_classes_hasher11xcallocatorE26find_empty_slot_for_expandEj.str1.8:
...
-Disassembly of section
.rodata._ZN10hash_tableI19cost_classes_hasher11xcallocatorE26find_empty_slot_for_expandEj.str1.8:
+Disassembly of section
.rodata._ZN10hash_tableI19cost_classes_hasher11xcallocatorE6expandEv.str1.8:
There is no semantic difference between the objects, just the ordering.
I assume it's the same problem for the rest of the objects and
architectures.
I will look into this, unless someone beats me to it, or has an idea
right off the bat.
Aldy
