> On May 5, 2015, at 8:13 PM, Aditya K <hiradi...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> So, I analyzed other warnings and following is the list of relevant warning
> that I could collect. Hope this is useful.
>
>
> gcc/ipa-icf.c:508:12: warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand
> side of this comparison
> ../../gcc/ipa-icf.c:508:12: warning: logical not is only applied to the left
> hand side of this comparison [-Wlogical-not-parentheses]
> if ((!type == FUNC || address || !opt_for_fn (decl, optimize_size))
>
> gcc/expr.c:5271:9: warning: comparison of constant -1 with expression of type
> 'unsigned int' is always false [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
> ../../gcc/expr.c:5271:9: warning: comparison of constant -1 with expression
> of type 'unsigned int' is always false
> [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
> if (!SUBREG_CHECK_PROMOTED_SIGN (target,
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> There was a similar bug posted some time ago
> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61271)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> gcc/reload1.c:470:28: warning: incrementing expression of type bool is
> deprecated [-Wdeprecated-increment-bool]
> ../../gcc/reload1.c:470:28: warning: incrementing expression of type bool is
> deprecated [-Wdeprecated-increment-bool]
> spill_indirect_levels++;
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>
> Seems like for this bug we need to change the declaration of
>
> bool this_target_reload::x_spill_indirect_levels to an int. Even the comment
> there mentions that this variable might take
> other integral values.
>
> /* Nonzero if indirect addressing is supported on the machine; this means
> that spilling (REG n) does not require reloading it into a register in
> order to do (MEM (REG n)) or (MEM (PLUS (REG n) (CONST_INT c))). The
> value indicates the level of indirect addressing supported, e.g., two
> means that (MEM (MEM (REG n))) is also valid if (REG n) does not get
> a hard register. */
> bool x_spill_indirect_levels;
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> gcc/rtlanal.c:5573:23: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array
> (which contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> ../../gcc/rtlanal.c:5573:23: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the
> array (which contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> *second = GEN_INT (CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH (value));
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These warnings are bogus due to the array being the last element of the
structure.
Please file that with clang.
Thanks,
Andrew
>
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1757:30: note: expanded from macro 'CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH'
> #define CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH(r) XCMWINT (r, 1, CONST_DOUBLE, VOIDmode)
> ^ ~
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1123:36: note: expanded from macro 'XCMWINT'
> #define XCMWINT(RTX, N, C, M) ((RTX)->u.hwint[N])
> ^
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:3193:51: note: expanded from macro 'GEN_INT'
> #define GEN_INT(N) gen_rtx_CONST_INT (VOIDmode, (N))
> ^
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:397:5: note: array 'hwint' declared here
> HOST_WIDE_INT hwint[1];
> ^
> ../../gcc/hwint.h:54:26: note: expanded from macro 'HOST_WIDE_INT'
> # define HOST_WIDE_INT long
> ^
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> gcc/vec.h:1048:10: warning: offset of on non-POD type 'vec_embedded' (aka
> 'vec<c_expr::id_tab, va_heap, vl_embed>') [-Winvalid-offsetof]
> ../../gcc/vec.h:1048:10: warning: offset of on non-POD type 'vec_embedded'
> (aka 'vec<std::pair<expr_hash_elt *, expr_hash_elt *>, va_heap, vl_embed>')
> [-Winvalid-offsetof]
> return offsetof (vec_embedded, m_vecdata) + alloc * sizeof (T);
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~
> /home/hiraditya/work/llvm/install-release/bin/../lib/clang/3.7.0/include/stddef.h:120:24:
> note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
> #define offsetof(t, d) __builtin_offsetof(t, d)
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> genrtl.h:435:3: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array (which
> contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> ./genrtl.h:435:3: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array (which
> contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> XWINT (rt, 1) = arg1;
> ^ ~
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1120:29: note: expanded from macro 'XWINT'
> #define XWINT(RTX, N) ((RTX)->u.hwint[N])
> ^
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:397:5: note: array 'hwint' declared here
> HOST_WIDE_INT hwint[1];
> ^
> ../../gcc/hwint.h:54:26: note: expanded from macro 'HOST_WIDE_INT'
> # define HOST_WIDE_INT long
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> gcc/final.c:3957:8: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array
> (which contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> ../../gcc/final.c:3957:8: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array
> (which contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> if (CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH (x))
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1757:30: note: expanded from macro 'CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH'
> #define CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH(r) XCMWINT (r, 1, CONST_DOUBLE, VOIDmode)
> ^ ~
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1123:36: note: expanded from macro 'XCMWINT'
> #define XCMWINT(RTX, N, C, M) ((RTX)->u.hwint[N])
> ^
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:397:5: note: array 'hwint' declared here
> HOST_WIDE_INT hwint[1];
> ^
> ../../gcc/hwint.h:54:26: note: expanded from macro 'HOST_WIDE_INT'
> # define HOST_WIDE_INT long
> ^
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> gcc/cse.c:6171:38: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array (which
> contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> ../../gcc/cse.c:6171:38: warning: array index 1 is past the end of the array
> (which contains 1 element) [-Warray-bounds]
> || (CONST_DOUBLE_P (new_rtx) && CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH (new_rtx)>= 0))
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1757:30: note: expanded from macro 'CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH'
> #define CONST_DOUBLE_HIGH(r) XCMWINT (r, 1, CONST_DOUBLE, VOIDmode)
> ^ ~
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:1123:36: note: expanded from macro 'XCMWINT'
> #define XCMWINT(RTX, N, C, M) ((RTX)->u.hwint[N])
> ^
> ../../gcc/rtl.h:397:5: note: array 'hwint' declared here
> HOST_WIDE_INT hwint[1];
> ^
> ../../gcc/hwint.h:54:26: note: expanded from macro 'HOST_WIDE_INT'
> # define HOST_WIDE_INT long
> ^
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> gcc/gcov-tool.c:225:7: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever
> 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> gcc/gcov-tool.c:493:7: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever
> 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:225:7: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized
> whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> if (argc - optind == 2)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:230:10: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> return ret;
> ^~~
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:225:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always
> true
> if (argc - optind == 2)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:196:10: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence
> this warning
> int ret;
> ^
> = 0
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:493:7: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized
> whenever 'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> if (argc - optind == 2)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:498:10: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> return ret;
> ^~~
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:493:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always
> true
> if (argc - optind == 2)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ../../gcc/gcov-tool.c:462:10: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence
> this warning
> int ret;
> ^
> = 0
>
>
> I think I can fix few of these if we want them to be fixed.
> For some e.g. ( gcc/gcov-tool.c:225:7: warning: array index 1 is past the end
> of the array (which contains 1 element) ),
> I have no idea what is the proper fix for them.
>
> -Aditya
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 21:57:08 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Compiler warnings while compiling gcc with clang
>> From: jwakely....@gmail.com
>> To: hiradi...@msn.com
>> CC: pins...@gmail.com; renato.go...@linaro.org; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>>
>>> On 5 May 2015 at 12:39, Aditya K wrote:
>>> There are however, other differences between class and struct
>>> (http://stackoverflow.com/a/999810/811335) i.e.,
>>>
>>> 1. In absence of an access-specifier for a base class, public is assumed
>>> when the derived class is declared struct and private is assumed when the
>>> class is declared class.
>>
>> Yes, everyone here knows that. That is only relevant to the definition
>> of the class, which can only occur once. For the purposes of
>> declarations that are not definitions there is no difference.
>>
>>> 2. class can be used in place of a typename to declare a template
>>> parameter, while the struct cannot.
>>
>> Completely irrelevant in this context. The use of 'class' in a
>> template parameter list has nothing to do with struct or class types,
>> nor forward declarations of struct or class types.
>
